Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Commercial Carriers, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1954No. Docket 81, Calendar 45,452PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Plaintiff, who is appellee and cross appellant, filed 3 claims with the workmen’s compensation commission, as follows:
“1. Seessel Armstrong v. Commercial Carriers, Incorporated and Consolidated Underwriters; alleged accident: July 1945 * * * (claim 1)
“2. Seessel Armstrong v. Commercial Contracting Company and Consolidated Underwriters; alleged accident: October 7, 1946 * * * (claim 2)
“3. Seessel Armstrong v. Commercial Carriers, Incorporated, a self-insurer; alleged accident: March 15, 1949 * * * (claim 3).”
The 3 claims were consolidated and the deputy commissioner found that the injury of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- National Nut Co. of California v. Susu Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
- In Re Milner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People Ex Rel. Director of Conservation v. BabcockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rahman v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Russell v. Shippers Dispatch, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974