Legal Opinion

Higgs v. New York Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1954No. Appeal, 121PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit to recover for a loss under a fire insurance policy. The defendant filed an amended answer and new matter. Preliminary objections to the new matter were sustained by the court below, the case was declared at issue on complaint and answer, and defendant has appealed.

The plaintiffs have moved to quash the appeal on the ground that the order of the court below is interlocutory. There is no merit to such contention. This order is final because it has removed defendant’s new matter from the case. At the trial defendant would thereby be prevented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broido v. KinnemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. BeilerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Saxe v. FEINSTEINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Clingerman v. Everett Cash Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Kinsey Distilling Corp. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Adcox v. PA. MFGRS'ASSN. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Pellegrine v. Home InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Urban v. UrbanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API