Legal Opinion

Trejo v. MacIel

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1966No. Civ. 22157PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

Plaintiffs, who were injured in an automobile accident for which liability is admitted by defendant Joseph P. Maciel, appeal on the grounds (1) that the judgment against him is inadequate in amount, and (2) that the judgment in favor of the other defendant is erroneous.

Recitation of the facts preceding the accident is given below, but at this point the facts of the accident itself are stated. On December 1, 1961, at 12:55 a.m., while appellants were seated in a vehicle waiting for a red light to change, a car driven by Joseph P. Maciel struck them from the rear. Maciel denied that he had been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ronald A. Baptist v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Munyon v. Ole's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. United States v. Richard M. RomittiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API