Legal Opinion

Love v. Shartzer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, C. J.:

This is an action of ejectment for two distinct parcels of land, parts of a larger tract which the plaintiff derived by grant from the Mexican Government, and which was confirmed and set apart to her by the Government of the United States within five years before this action was commenced. One of these parcels of land consisted of about sixty-five acres and the other of about thirty-five acres. The action was not only to recover the possession of the demanded premises, but also to recover damages in a large sum measured by the value of the rents and profits thereof…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fee v. CowdrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. F. A. Hihn Co. v. FlecknerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Johnston v. DebockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API