State v. Johnson (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} Sudinia Johnson appeals from a judgment of the Twelfth District Court of Appeals which affirmed his conviction for trafficking in cocaine and held that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule permitted the admission of evidence obtained from a global-positioning-system (“GPS”) tracking device that Detective Mike Hackney had placed on Johnson’s vehicle without obtaining a search warrant.
{¶ 2} The United States Supreme Court crafted the exclusionary rule to deter violations of the rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, but it has recognized…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. Leak (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MatheneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.