Legal Opinion

Pidcock v. Sunnyland America, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided November 17, 1987No. CV486-352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, District Judge.

This civil action, brought pursuant to § 10(b) and § 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a), respectively), SEC Rule 10(b)(5), and state law on fraud, was tried before the Court on September 15 and 16, 1987. Having heard the testimony of the witnesses and having reviewed the relevant documentary evidence, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. To the extent any findings of fact constitute conclusions of law, they are adopted as such. To the extent any conclusions of law constitute findings…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,357 Marbury Management, Inc., and Harry Bader, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Alfred Kohn, and Wood, Walker & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Pidcock v. Sunnyland America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1989
  2. John F. Pidcock v. Sunnyland America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API