Purnell v. Grieg
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Clyde Purnell, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that his constitutional rights were violated in certain respects in 2010, while plaintiff was confined at Groveland Correctional Facility. Defendants, all of whom at all relevant times were employed by DOCS at Groveland, have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has also…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'Diah v. ArtusDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Sowell v. NorthropDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011