Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Boise City

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1967No. 9898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

Appellants, as plaintiffs, petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate to compel respondents to process their petition and initiative ordinance which would permit a vote by the electorate in Boise City on the issue of its participation in the Urban Renewal Program adopted by the State Legislature in 1965. Appellants also sought to have The Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, -I.C. §§ 50-4701 to 50-4718, chap. 246, Idaho Session Laws of 1965, declared unconstitutional.

The proposed petition and initiative ordinance was submitted to the city council in conformance with, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Messenger v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API