Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gibbons v. Atlas Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1941No. 29797Published

1DissentArnold, J.

The pertinent facts in this case are: Gibbons, Warsaski, and Stout owned an oil and gas mining lease on certain blocks in Oklahoma City; they assigned %ths of the working interest to Larkins & Warr, a copartnership, in consideration that Larkins & Warr would produce said lease and deliver, free of cost to them, %ths of the working interest; Larkins & Warr developed said lease and was producing oil and gas therefrom when the Globe Oil & Refining Company asked for a receiver for the Larkins & Warr interest; a receiver was appointed for the Larkins & Warr interest; qualified and went into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Savoy Oil Co. v. EmerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. BuseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Western Paving v. Bd. of Com'rs of LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. National Aid Life Ass'n v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API