People v. Holmes
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. Matt. E. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
—The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny for having feloniously taken from the person of L. H. Poston one certain twenty-dollar bill. The crime was committed in the city of Sacramento, at the defendant’s place of business, known as the Eeal Thing saloon.
1. The most of the evidence against the defendant came from said Poston, two women who accompanied him to the saloon, and from the defendant himself. It would serve no useful purpose to either state or analyze this evidence; we deem it sufficient to say that the verdict of the jury finds ample support in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Lon YeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. Ong GitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- State v. CrenshawOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. Von PerhacsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. MetzlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.