Legal Opinion

Hubbard Banking Co. v. Koetsch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1924No. 14247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

Mary E. Hart, who formerly lived in Ohio, died in Logan county, Okla., on January 27, 1919; on March 31, 1919, letters testamentary were issued by the county court of Logan county to Marie E. Koetsch as administratrix with the will annexed of Mary E. Hart, deceased; on March 31, 1919, said admin-istratrix caused due notice to be given to the creditors of said deceased to present their claims within four months from that date; on January 9, 1920, the Hubbard

Banking Company presented a proof of claim, containing a copy of a note, for the principal sum of $3,000, dated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Engmann v. Estate of ImmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Lewis v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  5. Middleton v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. JC Penney Company v. BarrientezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Palacine Oil Co. v. PhilpotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Marland Refining Co. v. SniderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. First Trust & Savings Bank v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Marland Refining Co. v. SniderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API