Legal Opinion

Butler v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 17, 1964No. Civ. A. 14609-4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECKER, District Judge.

In this Federal Tort Claims Act case, the plaintiff has asked for additional time to file suggestions in opposition to defendant’s suggestions in support of its objections to plaintiff’s interrogatories. In view of the conclusions reached in this memorandum, no such reply suggestions will be necessary.

Defendant first objects to plaintiff’s Interrogatory No. 2 which is as follows:

“If the answer to the preceding Interrogatory is in the affirmative, please attach a copy or copies of all such writings or transcripts to your answers to these Interrogatories.”

The preceding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Hayman v. Pullman Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
  4. The New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Alva O. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  5. Wycoff v. NicholsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hughes v. GrovesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
  2. Sea Colony, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  3. Dingler v. Halcyon Lijn N. V.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Steelman v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
  5. Straughan v. Barge MVL No. 802District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API