Ashenfelter v. Carpenter
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Montrose County. Hon. Theron Stevens, Judge. ■ Action by John. Ashenfelter and James O’Neill, Jene O’Neill, John Tobin, Bernard S. Tobin, Richard Keller, Lena Keller, H. L. Robinson, George Price, John C. Bell, Jesse Bell and J. C. Frees, against L. G. Carpenter, Arthur H. Stokes and W. O. Plersum. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Decision en banc.
1Per curiam
Excepting one, the questions presented by this appeal are the same as those disposed of adversely to the contention of appellants in Irrigation Co. v. Water S. & S. Co., 29 Colo. 469; Fluke v. Ford, 35 Colo. 112; New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Arthur Irrigation Co., ante, page 530.
Counsel for appellants contend that, because a change in the point of diversion of the priorities belonging- to them was perfected prior to the date when the act of 1899 and the act of 1903, on the same subject (Sess. Laws 1899, p..235, and Sess. Laws 1903, p. 278), took effect, that appellants are not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Fluke v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ironstone Ditch Co. v. AshenfelterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Lindsey v. McClureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943