Ironstone Ditch Co. v. Ashenfelter
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Montrose District Court. — Hon Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues
This case involves a transfer on the Uncompahgre river, of early priorities from ditches located down the stream in the neighborhood of Delta, up the stream, above the city of Montrose, into the Montrose & Delta canal, called the Montrose canal, and is the sequel of Ashenfelter v. Carpenter and Gutshall v. Carpenter, Nos. 4834 and 4862, 37 Colo. 534 and 536, 87 Pac. 800, 801. The court entered a permissive decree allowing the change, and protestants bring the ease here on appeal.
1. November, 1888, the general adjudication decree entered in the district court at Montrose settled the priorities…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Cache La Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Boulder & Weld County Ditch Co. v. Lower Boulder Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reno v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Colorado Springs v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Trinchera Ranch Co. v. Trinchera Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Arnold v. RoupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Rio Grande Reservoir & Ditch Co. v. Wagon Wheel Gap Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.