Legal Opinion
Dyer-Neely v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 5, 1984No. 83 C 5376PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Diane Dyer-Neely (“Dyer-Neely”) and Stephanie Kimbrough (“Kimbrough”) charge the City of Chicago (“City”) and Mayor Harold Washington with violating Rehabilitation Act of 1973 § 504, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Section 794”). Plaintiffs allege City’s medical standards for police officers discriminate against persons who, though “handicapped” within the meaning of Section 794, can perform all the essential functions of a police officer.
Plaintiffs now seek to certify, under Fed. R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 23(b)(2),1 two classes of persons described in First…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Alliance to End Repression v. James M. Rochford, Etc., American Civil Liberties Union v. Griffin B. BellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Edmondson v. SimonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Long v. Thornton Township High School District 205District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Massengill v. Board of Education, Antioch Community High SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hendricks-Robinson v. Excel Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1996