Legal Opinion

Hendricks-Robinson v. Excel Corp.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-3156PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Excel Corporation’s “medical layoff policy” is alleged to violate the ADA.

Plaintiffs request class certification.

Initially, the Court rejected that request.

Upon reconsideration, the Court reversed its prior ruling.

The class is certified.1

I. Background

Excel is a national multi-plant operation engaged in the slaughter and processing of pork products. Plaintiffs were employed at Excel’s Beardstown, Illinois, plant.

Most of Excel’s employees perform highly repetitive production line jobs involving cutting, slicing, and packing. The Beardstown employees are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cima v. Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2008
  2. McCullah v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Lucas v. GC Services L.P.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005
  5. Exhaust Unlimited, Inc. v. Cintas Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API