Legal Opinion
Community State Bank v. Durbin
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1951No. 18,116PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPT
2Per curiam
Appellees have filed a verified motion stating that the official shorthand reporter in transcribing her shorthand notes taken at the trial inadvertently omitted part of an answer to a question. This statement is supported by the affidavit of the reporter and the certificates of the trial judge and clerk of the court.
Appellees ask “that said omission above mentioned be inserted as a permanent part of the transcript of evidence given in this cause.”
*232It is said in II Watson’s Rev., Works’ Practice 668, §2097:
“The application to amend a bill of exceptions can not be…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Morgantown Manufacturing Co. v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Wabash Portland Cement Co. v. EvartsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Community State Bank v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
4Cited by6 opinions
- Slinkard v. Babb, WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Clevenger v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Tommy Gonns, Alias Thomas Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Community State Bank v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Cronemeyer v. First National Bank of NortheastDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.