Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Hammet

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 9, 1961No. 48024PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEEDY, Presiding Judge.

This is a proceeding by scire facias to revive the judgment in this action. Rendered originally on July 7, 1949, it was for a sum in excess of $15,000, no part of which has ever been paid. Although entirely unnecessary to do so, yet the plaintiffs did, on June 18, 1959 (all references to dates are to the year 1959 unless otherwise not*77•ed), file an “application” for scire facias to revive the judgment. The writ was issued the same day, returnable to the ensuing September term of court. It was agreed that this writ was never served on defendant, and such being the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sutton v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Goddard ex rel. Hyde v. DelaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. State Ex Rel. Silverman v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Kennedy v. BodenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Reyburn v. HandlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robert L. v. Danzig (In Re Howard J.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Hickman v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Moore v. LunaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Strunk v. Commercial Plastics Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API