Legal Opinion

Rice v. Farmers & Merchants Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1990No. Nos. 16606, 16625PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff sought recovery upon the collision property damage provisions of an automobile insurance policy, and vexatious damages for refusal to pay. Following nonjury trial, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $19,450 but denying her claim for vexatious damages and attorneys fees. Both parties appeal.

Review is under Rule 73.01(c). Under that rule, we are to affirm the judgment unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, it erroneously declares the law, or erroneously applies the law. Robertson v. Clark Bros.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Morris v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Galemore v. Mid-West National Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bolt v. GiordanoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API