Commonwealth v. Baez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, J.:
This is a Commonwealth appeal from the trial court’s order granting part of Lazaro Rodriguez-Baez’s (Defendant) motion to suppress. The Commonwealth claims that the trial court erred in suppressing Appellant’s statements because at the time that Appellant made the statements, the police had given him Miranda warnings. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We agree, and for the reasons that follow, we reverse.
This appeal arises from the prosecution of Defendant for his drug dealing activity. After the police executed three controlled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Com. v. Williams, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Williams, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. SimpkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Com. v. Butler, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.