Estate of Garrity
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a decree of distribution of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County and from orders for a family allowance and settling the final account of the executor. Joseph P. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
After a full consideration of this cause in Bank we are satisfied with the conclusion reached in Department, and with the opinion of Mr. Justice Harrison therein delivered. In accordance with said opinion the superior court is directed to modify the decree of distribution by striking therefrom the following proviso: “Provided that the sum of one hundred dollars of said distribution shall have been heretofore re*466eeived by Thomas Garrity, and that the sum of fifteen dollars has been received by James Garrity”; and, as so modified, the decree is affirmed. The orders for a family…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. . Van OstrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Covenhoven v. ShulerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
- Matter of Petition of CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Westcott v. CadyNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
- Flanagan v. FlanaganNew York Supreme Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- In re the Estate of GorkowWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Bliss v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Colburn v. BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.