Legal Opinion
Powell v. Fuller Brush Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 9, 1954No. Civ. No. 56-53PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion made by the defendant, The Fuller Brush Company, before filing answer, to dismiss the complaint because of failure to state a cause of action, or in lieu thereof for summary judgment in its behalf.
*240The complaint filed herein alleges the hiring in 1934 of the plaintiff, Dwight W. Powell, by the defendant, The Fuller Brush Company, through its Division Manager, A1 Teetsel, for life employment, with certain other alleged conditions. The complaint further alleged “Said A1 Teetsel as Division Manager was possessed of expressed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Sarnoff v. CiagliaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Shiddell v. Electro Rust-Proofing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Dubin v. Shaw, No. Cv90 307527 (Dec. 7, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Yokem v. GriffithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958