State v. Hockensmith

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order in revocation proceedings for execution of sentences previously imposed. The questions presented are (1) whether the revocation court erred in refusing to modify the original imposition of consecutive sentences to run concurrently and (2) whether appellant’s consecutive sentence for his second conviction should be reduced from 32 months to 24 months.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

FACTS

On June 29, 1983, appellant Terry A. Hockensmith committed two separate acts of criminal sexual conduct on two women in Crystal, Minnesota. In…