Legal Opinion
American Alloys, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 11, 1993No. Court 91-10-00782PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT
CARMAN, Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 56.1 plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record. Plaintiffs challenge a portion of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Metal from Argentina, 56 Fed. Reg. 37,891, 37,895 (Aug. 9, 1991), Pub. Doc. 157 (A.R. 2275, 2279), issued by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce).
This action is brought pursuant to section 516A(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) (Supp.1991), and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1988), which give…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Magnesuim Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- American Alloys, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- American Alloys, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.