Legal Opinion
Historic Aircraft Recovery Corp. v. Wrecked & Abandoned Voight F4U-1 Corsair Aircraft
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 24, 2003No. 2:03-cv-00150PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SINGAL, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court are two motions to dismiss: (1) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) filed by the State of Maine (Docket # 20) (the “State’s Motion to Dismiss”) and (2) Motion of the United Kingdom to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) (Docket # 25) (the “United Kingdom’s Motion to Dismiss”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the State’s Motion to Dismiss and, therefore, finds the United Kingdom’s Motion to Dismiss MOOT.
I. MOTION TO DISMISS STANDARD
The motions to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sullivan v. GENERAL HELICOPTERS, INT'LDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Safari Aviation, Inc. v. Aircraft Casa 212High Court of American Samoa · 2004
- Sunglory Maritime, Ltd. v. PHI, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016