Legal Opinion

Safari Aviation, Inc. v. Aircraft Casa 212

High Court of American Samoa

Decided September 30, 2004No. CA No. 88-04Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH AIRCRAFT ARREST AND STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO

Introduction

On February 12, 2004, Plaintiffs Safari Airlines, Inc., Safari Pacific Airways, and SAF, Ltd. (together “Safari”) entered into a contract with Defendant Village Aviation, Inc. (“Village”) in which Village agreed to provide Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) and Department of Transportation (“DOT”) authorized aircraft, flight crew, and maintenance personnel to Safari for transportation of cargo from Pago Pago International Airport to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. United States v. One 1978 Piper Navajo Pa-31, Aircraft, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Meaamaile v. American SamoaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API