Legal Opinion

Petersen v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1964No. 9422PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Kermit D. Petersen, filed a condemnation action in the district court, by which they sought to exercise eminent domain against the State of Idaho for a roadway to their property. The defendant-respondent, the State of Idaho, filed a motion to dismiss alleging-lack of jurisdiction in the district court to entertain such a suit. Stated more specifically, the respondent alleged that it had not and would not consent to such an ac- lion and that no authority existed which would permit such a suit against it.

The district court granted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hollister v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Blue Note, Inc. v. HopperIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State ex rel. Galen v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Thomas v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Weippe v. YarnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. Faron Raymond HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. County of Ada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Sun Valley Ranches, Inc. v. Prairie Power Cooperative, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API