Petersen v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Kermit D. Petersen, filed a condemnation action in the district court, by which they sought to exercise eminent domain against the State of Idaho for a roadway to their property. The defendant-respondent, the State of Idaho, filed a motion to dismiss alleging-lack of jurisdiction in the district court to entertain such a suit. Stated more specifically, the respondent alleged that it had not and would not consent to such an ac- lion and that no authority existed which would permit such a suit against it.
The district court granted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Hollister v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Blue Note, Inc. v. HopperIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- State ex rel. Galen v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomas v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Weippe v. YarnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. Faron Raymond HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- County of Ada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Sun Valley Ranches, Inc. v. Prairie Power Cooperative, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.