Legal Opinion
King v. Industrial Bank of Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 1984No. 83-254PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment for a bank in an action by the bank against appellant, the guarantor of a loan in default. We hold that there were no material issues of fact and that, on the undisputed facts, the bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
In January 1979 appellant King, president of the now-defunct Nectra Corporation, and Bentley Y. Plummer, Nectra’s secretary-treasurer, each signed documents labeled “Unlimited Guaranty” by which they personally guaranteed “payment when due ... of any and all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Orange Crush Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- American Insurance Co. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Walton v. Mariner Health of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Florence Goldman v. August BequaiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- High v. McLean Financial Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- NRT Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Innovative Properties, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.