State v. . Bunting
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of perjury. A motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment failed to charge that it was committed "feloniously," was overruled, and the defendant appealed. This question has been so often decided that it requires no further discussion. S. v. Purdie, 67 N.C. 25; S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848; S.v. Caldwell, ib., 854; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 979; S. v. Snow, 117 N.C. 774.
Reversed.
Cited: S. v. Mallett, 125 N.C. 724; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1002; S.v. Harris, 145 N.C. 458.
(1201)
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . MallettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- State v. . SnowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . SkidmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954