Legal Opinion

State v. . Bunting

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of perjury. A motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment failed to charge that it was committed "feloniously," was overruled, and the defendant appealed. This question has been so often decided that it requires no further discussion. S. v. Purdie, 67 N.C. 25; S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848; S.v. Caldwell, ib., 854; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 979; S. v. Snow, 117 N.C. 774.

Reversed.

Cited: S. v. Mallett, 125 N.C. 724; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1002; S.v. Harris, 145 N.C. 458.

(1201)

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. State v. . MallettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. State v. . SnowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. State v. . SkidmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API