Legal Opinion

State v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The defendant moved in this Court in arrest of judgment. The motion is bottomed on the contention that the count upon which she was tried and convicted in the court below does not contain her name, and is, therefore, fatally defective. In support of her position she cites S. v. Phelps, 65 N.C. 450; S. v. McCollum, 181 N.C. 584, 107 S.E. 309; and S. v. Camel, 230 N.C. 426, 53 S.E. 2d 313.

There appears to be some conflict in the decisions of this Court on the question raised by the defendant’s motion. In S. v. Phelps, supra, however, the motion in arrest of judgment was directed to a bill of…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API