Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodney Holloman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 30, 1992No. 92-1429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLO VITER, Chief Judge.

I

Introduction

Rodney Holloman was convicted following a jury trial of fourteen counts of possession of counterfeit securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(a), one count of use of an unassigned social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B), and two counts of possession of “an implement designed for or particularly suited for making a counterfeit or forged security with the intent that it be so used,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(b). He challenges only the conviction under section 513(b). Because his challenge is one of law, our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Richard CianscewskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Nicholas DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Carlos CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Sidney J. Dickler, Richard R. Petrucci. Sidney J. Dickler, in No. 94-3517. Richard R. Petrucci, in No. 94-3518Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Jorge Torres A/K/A George Boyd, Jr. Jorge Torres, United States of America v. Jorge Torres A/K/A George Boyd, Jr. Jorge TorresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. KaczmarskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. United States v. Pierre WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. State v. BoutteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API