United States v. Carlos Castillo
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This single issue appeal raises the question of whether a counterfeit currency detector found in the possession of defendant is a “counterfeiting device” which permits enhancement of a sentence under section 2B5.1(b)(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines. Although we regard it as a close question, we affirm the district court’s decision that it is.
Defendant Carlos Castillo was found guilty of unlawfully bringing approximately $8,000 in counterfeit United States currency into this country. 18 U.S.C. § 472. At sentencing, the district court concluded that defendant’s base level should be increased…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dr. Henry McLemore II v. Paul J. Landry, Sun Belt Federal Bank v. River Villa PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Ted Allen, AKA Ted Alan WachtinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Mario J. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Suárez-GonzálezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Rodney HollomanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Suarez-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.