Legal Opinion
Jack E. Wright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 13, 1998No. 97-3452PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge.
On June 28, 1989, a jury found Jack E. Wright guilty of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; aiding and abetting an armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and aiding and abetting the use of a dangerous weapon during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. 1
Subsequently the Supreme Court decided Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995) and concluded that under § 924(c)(1). the Govem ment must…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James R. Wilson v. Linda A. Giesen, County of LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Herbert Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Thomas PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Haugh v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Christopher Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Vernard L. Green, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Bates v. Northwestern Human Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Public Citizen Health Research Group v. National Institutes of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.