Legal Opinion

United States v. James A. Karlock

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1970No. 24871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this selective service case, Karlock was able to get his claim for conscientious objector classification adequately (so far as a paper showing is concerned) before the Appeals Board. That board rejected his claim. (A Selective Service officer had suggested he do so inasmuch as an appeal was pending from the local board in Karlock’s student classification.)

Selective Service having invited him to make such a claim, we conclude Karlock was entitled to some ruling or notice that would have enabled him to request a personal appearance before the local board. This was not done and we regard it…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence Gaylord OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. RodwellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  3. Jack L. Edwards v. Selective Service Local Board No. 111, Newton County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Jack L. Edwards v. Selective Service Local Board No. 111, Newton County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API