Jack L. Edwards v. Selective Service Local Board No. 111, Newton County, Georgia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentTuttle, Circuit Judge
(dissenting);
Although I agree with much that is said in the majority opinion, I must respectfully dissent.
I agree that since Oestereich v. Selective Service System, etc., 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414 (1968) § 10(b) (3) of the Military Selective Service Act is no longer a bar to preinduction review. I further agree that preinduetion review is not limited toncases in which deferments are revoked in a blatantly lawless manner, but includes those which a registrant alleges the blatantly lawless removal of procedural rights guaranteed to him by the regulations promulgated in accordance with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mulloy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Knox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Jesus M. Olvera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Dennis Murray CumminsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.