Cashin v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion- of the court was delivered by
Sloan, J.:
This action is one to recover damages for personal injury. The trial court overruled a demurrer to the petition, from which the defendant appeals.
The petition alleges the residence of the plaintiff and the organization and existence of the state highway commission. The allegations necessary for our consideration are as follows:
“That at all times hereinafter mentioned United States highway No. 40 is and was a part of the state highway system of the state of Kansas, . . . and it was the duty of the defendant to . . . maintain said highway, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caspar v. LewinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- McCandliss Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Payne v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- McGraw v. Rural High School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Cashin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Bryan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1939