Legal Opinion

Desrosiers v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 1984PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the Superior Court declaring that the defendant insurer has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff Desrosiers against liability with respect to certain pending tort actions alleging bodily injuries as a result of Desrosiers’ negligent operation of a motor vehicle. We reverse.

The plaintiffs in the underlying tort actions, interveners here, alleged in those actions that they were aboard a motor vehicle that was owned by John M. Condon and was operated negligently by his employee, Desrosiers, with the result that a paving machine being transported by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terrio v. McDONOUGH HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Ratner v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co. Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchuitemaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Transit Casualty Co. v. Hartman's Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  5. Diamond International Corporation v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Billings v. COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API