Legal Opinion

Hillis v. City of Huntsville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 1963No. 8 Div. 118PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit superinduced by the ruling of the trial court sustaining demurrers to the complaint. The complaint, claiming damages for personal injuries, is framed in two counts under § 326(1) and (2), Title 26, Code of Ala. 1940, the Employers’ Liability Act.

Count I alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff was employed to work on the streets of the city, and while acting in such service, plaintiff was operating a tractor supplied and being used in the city’s business in cutting weeds “in a ditch along a certain public street”, when the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maxmilian v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hillman v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Morgan v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. City of Decatur v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Hilliard v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Bailey v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Hilliard v. CITY OF HUNTSVILLE ELEC. UTILITY BD.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ellison v. Town of BrooksideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API