Legal Opinion
Misewicz v. City of Memphis
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 27, 2012No. 10-2593-STAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. #22) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. #23), both filed on August 12, 2011. Both parties have responded in opposition to the Motions, and the moving parties have filed reply briefs. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
In this Fair Labor Standards Acts (“FLSA”)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jon Misewicz v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014