Legal Opinion
KOH Systems v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1996No. 95-AA-260PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
KOH Systems and Royal Insurance Company, petitioners, contend on appeal that the Acting Director (“Director”) of the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) erred in overruling the hearing examiner’s decision that the applicable statute of limitations, D.C.Code § 36-314(a) (1993 Repl.), barred intervenor Paul G. Meinke’s workers’ compensation claim. The examiner concluded, and the Director disagreed, that Meinke’s claim had been untimely filed because he had been aware more than a year before filing his claim that his injuries were work-related. We conclude that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Harris v. District of Columbia Office of Worker's CompensationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. McCabeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Vieira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Morrison v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Harrison v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bell Atlantic-Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.