Legal Opinion
Madonna v. Harley Davidson, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 1998No. 1702 and 1775PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgment entered following the denial of Appellants’ post-trial motions. Charles Madonna and Dolores Wilson instituted the underlying action for damages resulting from an accident that occurred that while they were riding on a motorcycle manufactured by Appellee, Harley Davidson Inc. Their claims against the defendant were based on a theory of strict liability. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A Following a jmy trial, a verdict, in response to a special interrogatory, was rendered finding the motorcycle defect was not a substantial factor in causing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Kimco Development Corp. v. Michael D'S Carpet Outlets & Laramie Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Jara v. Rexworks Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- COM., DEPT. OF GENERAL SERVICES v. US Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Wright v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Anne K. Wilson Oliver J. Larmi v. Vermont Castings, Inc. Vci Acquisition Co. PacificorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.