Legal Opinion
In Re Baker
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 10, 2008No. 19-50111PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION 1
CHRISTOPHER S. SONTCHI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Debtors’ Emergency Motion to Reopen and for Rule to Show Cause for Willful Violation of a Court Order for Wrongful Repossession of a Motor Vehicle (the “Motion for Rule to Show Cause”) filed by Donald and Theresa Baker (the “Debtors”). The Debtors argue that Ford Motor Credit Company (the “Creditor”) wrongfully repossessed the Debtors’ motor vehicle where the Debtors and Creditor timely entered into a reaffirmation agreement under section 524 of the Bankruptcy Code but the Court refused to approve the reaffirmation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re DonaldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- In Re: Michael B. Price Christine R. Price, Debtors Michael B. Price Christine R. Price v. Delaware State Police Federal Credit Union U.S. Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In Re RoweUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- In Re MeyersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burtch v. Masiz (In re Vaso Active Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Dumont)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Coastal Federal Credit Union v. HardimanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Daimler Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC v. Jones (In Re Jones)District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
- Flint v. West Virginia State Tax Department (In re Flint)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.