Legal Opinion
Coastal Federal Credit Union v. Hardiman
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided October 28, 2008No. 5:08-cv-00017PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEYER III, District Judge.
In 2005, Congress amended the Bankruptcy Code via the “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005,” Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 (“BAPCPA”). This case presents the question whether BAPCPA contains a modified version of the “ride-through” option where debtors without legal counsel timely enter into a reaffirmation agreement concerning personal property with their creditor and submit the reaffirmation agreement to the bankruptcy court, but the bankruptcy court refuses to approve the reaffirmation agreement. The bankruptcy court…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Dumont)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re McMullenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
- In Re PerkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
- In Re ClarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- In Re McGregorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.