Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Wilson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1919No. 87-2867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Second Supreme Judicial District Action by J. A. Wilson against T. I. Richardson and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and, on appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals by defendant named, the judgment was reformed and affirmed (178 S. W. 566), and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, P. J.

J. A. Wilson brought this suit against T. I. Richardson and J. M. Senter to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations as to the character and value of a certain stock of groceries at Lillian, Tex., which Wilson had received from Richardson in part payment for Wilson’s interest in a drug business at Ft. Worth. The plaintiff also sought a recovery against said Richardson of a balance alleged to be due by .Richardson under a contract by which Wilson sold to Richardson his interest in the drug business. There was a trial by jury upon special issues, and upon the verdict the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reed v. HesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Loma Vista Development Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Johnson v. TunstallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Butler v. Southwest Dairy Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Godwin v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API