Legal Opinion

Bell v. Smith Concrete Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 322PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

As a general rule, the remedy for a breach of contract for the sale of personal property is an action at law, where damages are awarded. Rodgers v. Brock, 156 N.C. 401, 72 S.E. 820; 17A C.J.S. 1008-9. To invoke equitable jurisdiction, it must appear that the party injured by the breach can not be adequately compensated by monetary payment. If that be so, specific peformance may be decreed. 49 Am. Jur. 6; 81 C.J.S. 408. Specific performance is decreed only when necessary to require one to do that which in good conscience he ought to do without court compulsion.

Business survives because it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Bradshaw v. . MillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Stanley v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. SALEM REALTY COMPANY v. BatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Harborgate Property Owners Ass'n v. Mountain Lake Shores Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Curran v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Munchak Corp. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API