Gartner, Trustee v. Cassatt
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This is an effort by the trustee in bankruptcy of a firm of private bankers to follow money alleged to be trust property. The important question is, has a fiduciary relation between private banker and depositors been shown? The plaintiff, who is appellant, is trustee in bankruptcy of Muller and Company, a partnership, engaged in business as private bankers. The defendants, Cassatt and Company are stockbrokers. Appellant’s general position is that Muller & Company, in the conduct of their business, were quasi-trustees for depositors; that in the purchase and sale,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Engel v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ward v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Bair v. Snyder County State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Bulakowski v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Prudential Trust Co.'s AssignmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Aarons v. Public Service Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Gallagher, Admr. v. RoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- United States v. Fidelity Philadelphia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Hober's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.