Legal Opinion

Gartner, Trustee v. Cassatt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1933No. Appeal, 180PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This is an effort by the trustee in bankruptcy of a firm of private bankers to follow money alleged to be trust property. The important question is, has a fiduciary relation between private banker and depositors been shown? The plaintiff, who is appellant, is trustee in bankruptcy of Muller and Company, a partnership, engaged in business as private bankers. The defendants, Cassatt and Company are stockbrokers. Appellant’s general position is that Muller & Company, in the conduct of their business, were quasi-trustees for depositors; that in the purchase and sale,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Engel v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Ward v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bair v. Snyder County State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Bulakowski v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Prudential Trust Co.'s AssignmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Aarons v. Public Service Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Gallagher, Admr. v. RoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. United States v. Fidelity Philadelphia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. Hober's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API