Legal Opinion

DeCarlo v. Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 2, 2004No. 04-1388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Karen DeCarlo asks us to review the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Administration’s denial of her claim for disability insurance benefits. We conclude that the Commissioner’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the Administrative Law Judge posed a properly phrased hypothetical question to the vocational expert. Accordingly, we will affirm.

I

Since we write only for the parties, it is not necessary to recite the facts of this case except insofar as may be helpful to our brief discussion. Karen DeCarlo stopped working in July…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Joseph BURNS, Appellant v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Stephen R. VENTURA v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services. Stephen Ventura, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sarah E. Chalfont v. Leland DudekDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API