Legal Opinion
Sarah E. Chalfont v. Leland Dudek
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 20, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00968Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SARAH E. CHALFONT, ) ) ) 2:24-cv-968 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LELAND DUDEK, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Administrative Law Judge Joanna Papazekos found Plaintiff Sarah E. Chalfont no longer disabled as of July 2018. Ms. Chalfont appeals that order. On substantial-evidence review, ,
181 F.3d 429, 431
(3d Cir. 1999), the Court affirms. This is a continuing disability review (CDR) case.1 So ALJ Papazekos evaluated Ms. Chalfont’s medical improvement under the seven-step process.2 1 The Commissioner found Ms. Chalfont disabled in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Lisa Schaudeck v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- DeCarlo v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004