Legal Opinion

Orchid Softwear, Inc. v. PRENTICE-HALLL INC.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1991No. 3-90-076-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

JONES, Justice.

The opinion issued by this Court on December 5, 1990, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

Appellant Orchid Software, Inc., plaintiff below, complains of the trial court’s summary judgment that it is not entitled to recover lost profits from appellee Prentice-Hall, Inc. on Orchid’s suit for breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and tortious interference with contract. We will reverse the judgment and remand the cause.

By contract dated January 1983, Orchid promised to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Starcrest Trust v. Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  3. Mindgames, Inc. v. Western Publishing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Ishin Speed Sport, Inc. v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority/Central of Tennessee Railway & Navigation Co. v. Central of Tennessee Railway & Navigation Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API