Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Clark

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9316PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This suit was commenced by the appellees Elisha, Enoch and Isaac Clark, Mary Scott, Sarah Butler and *450llenas A. Kerr, against their co-appellee Elmer E. Kerr, h> obtain the partition of certain described real estate, in Miami county. It was alleged in the complaint, that the appellant, Josiah Farrar, also pretended to own said real estate, or some interest therein, whereby a cloud was cast upon the title of the plaintiffs and the defendant Elmer E. Kerr. The prayer of the complaint was for partition of the real estate between the plaintiffs and Elmer E. Kerr, according to their respective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Smith v. KylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McCaslin v. State ex rel. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Ellis v. KenyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Farrar v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Trittipo v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. O'Donnell v. KrnetaIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API